Answering the important question about the place of research in psychoanalysis and within APsA-an area that has shaped my clinical identity and my sense of our Association's future.
1. Research-Informed Beginnings
I was raised in an environment steeped in scientific inquiry, as my father devoted his career to biomedical research. Curiosity, disciplined questioning, and the pursuit of evidence were developmental for me and continue to guide how I approach problems.
2. Early Exposure to Culturally Informed Research
During medical school and graduate studies, I worked with Linda Garro, PhD, and John O'Neil, PhD, who introduced me to participant-observation, interpretive approaches, and mixed-methods research. This early exposure taught me that rigorous inquiry illuminates-rather than flattens-human complexity, and that psychological meaning is inseparable from cultural context.
3. Collaborative Research in the Canadian North
As a Community Medicine resident, I collaborated with the Inuit Women's Association in Ottawa, Inuit youth in the Arctic, and the University of Manitoba's Department of Community Health Sciences (with John O'Neil). Our work gathered adolescents' perspectives on culturally grounded ways to support at-risk youth and informed the development of a suicide-prevention video created with, and for, Inuit communities. I learned that research is fundamentally a partnership rooted in respect, cultural humility, and careful listening.
4. Research Engagement Throughout My Analytic Career
Although I do not currently conduct empirical studies, I remain deeply committed to reading, engaging with, and integrating research across domains-empirical, qualitative, conceptual, and theoretical. I chaired the International Teleanalysis Clinical Research Group (founded by Jill Scharff at the International Psychotherapy Institute), which examined process and outcome questions in long-distance analytic work-an increasingly relevant area for APsA and the IPA.
David Tuckett's collaborative project, Knowing What Psychoanalysts Do and Doing What Psychoanalysts Know, has deeply influenced my thinking-especially its systematic, internationally informed effort to examine clinical inference and analytic decision-making across a wide range of analytic traditions. APsA members will be able to engage with this work directly when Professor Tuckett presents a two-day symposium at our upcoming meeting.
5. Why Research Matters for APsA's Future
APsA is confronting essential questions about training standards, pluralism, and the role of remote or hybrid analytic training. Addressing these issues requires more than tradition or personal preference-it requires a research-informed sensibility, empirical openness, and conceptual clarity.
The IPA's new Action Research initiative offers a model for examining areas of conviction and uncertainty systematically. I am glad that APsA is participating actively in this work.
6. Honoring APsA's Research Legacy-and Revitalizing It
We inherit a strong but under-recognized research lineage in APsA. Leon Hoffman's longstanding commitment to psychoanalytic research spans his work on Regulation-Focused Psychotherapy for Children (RFP-C) and his leadership of APsA's Research Training Program (RTP), including its two-day Annual Meeting session supporting early-career researchers. Henry Bachrach contributed importantly to psychoanalytic outcome research and helped shape the empirical evaluation of analytic treatment. And Charles P. Fisher, M.D., Associate Head, APsA Science Department, has played a central role in fostering dialogue between psychoanalysis and empirical scientific inquiry.
There are, of course, many other APsA members engaged in important research across a wide range of methods and topics-far too many to list here-and their work is essential to the scientific life of our Association.
7. Commitments I Will Bring as President-Elect
If entrusted with leadership, I would:
• Strengthen APsA's research culture across Institutes and Sections
• Support early-career analysts, therapists, and trainees interested in empirical, qualitative, and conceptual research
• Engage APsA actively in the IPA's Action Research initiative
• Ensure that research remains central to APsA's identity as both a scientific and clinical organization
Closing Reflection
Research-in all its forms-has shaped my life, my training, and my leadership. It is central to how I understand psychoanalysis and to how I envision APsA's future. I am grateful for the opportunity to engage this question and look forward to continuing the conversation.











