How might APsA approach the issue of training standards for online or hybrid analytic education?
Current Work and Emerging Learning
At the upcoming APsA Annual Meeting, Tatiana Onikova and I will be presenting in Discussion Group 15: Distance Psychoanalysis and Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, co-chaired by David E. Scharff, M.D., FABP; R. Dennis Shelby, Ph.D., FIPA; and Ralph E. Fishkin, D.O. My contribution will focus on effective hybrid and online education-strengthening engagement between onsite and online learners, reducing anxieties around visibility and connection, and understanding the distinctive losses and gains inherent in distance learning contexts. In addition to this work, I also serve in APsA's newly formed Meetings Department chaired by Christopher Rigling, Psy.D., MBA, where I bring my background in virtual and hybrid training to help support APsA's evolving educational models.
Alongside these efforts, the IPA's First Cycle of Action Research will offer an additional and very meaningful source of learning, which the Distance Education Study Group will be examining in a separate venue. The Action Research findings will provide a rare window into the dynamics, conceptual divides, and lived experiences of analysts and analysts-in-training engaged in in-person analysis, teleanalysis, and hybrid analysis across international settings.

Research and Reflection Before July 2030
How might APsA approach the issue of training standards for online or hybrid analytic education? I see the period between now and July 2030 as a valuable opportunity to study this subject carefully-particularly the place and effectiveness of online analytic training, which is distinct from evaluating teleanalysis as a clinical practice.
The International Psychotherapy Institute (IPI), which I lead, has been a distance-learning analytic and psychotherapy training center since 1995. Long before COVID, IPI was functioning as a living research laboratory, immersed in questions of how analytic clinicians learn, work, and sustain analytic process across distance. We were also early in creating access to high-quality training for analytic therapist trainees and analysts-in-training who could not relocate or attend in person.
The International Psychoanalytical Association (IPA) supported this early inquiry with a research grant awarded to Janine Wanlass, PhD-senior IPI faculty member and past IPI Director-as Principal Investigator (together with other IPI colleagues). Dr. Wanlass' work drew on IPI's extensive experience with distance learning and with analytic work conducted across geographic distance. This line of study continued through APsA's COVID Advisory Committee, co-chaired initially by David Scharff, M.D., FABP, (IPI Co-Founder) and Todd Essig, Ph.D., and later by Dr. Scharff and Dan Prezant, Ph.D., FABP, where Dr. Wanlass led a large-scale survey of analysts' experiences with teleanalysis. Today many colleagues worldwide report adapting more readily than expected and often describe surprising continuity and depth in the analytic process when working remotely.
For many years, IPI colleagues and I also met monthly in the International Teleanalysis Clinical Research Group (which I chaired for several years), studying clinical material across in-person, telephone, and video settings. This sustained inquiry resulted in chapters across the four-volume Psychoanalysis Online series, edited by Jill Savege Scharff, M.D., FABP, IPI Co-Founder, and was presented at every IPA Pre-Congress since 2009, with contributions from many IPI and international colleagues.
Navigating Uncertainty With Openness and Care
The next five years give APsA the opportunity to reflect carefully on how we want to position ourselves in relation to evolving IPA standards-and in relation to our own growth in scholarship, clinical training, and research. We do not have to rush toward conclusions. My hope is that the work many of us have been doing-research, clinical study, group-process learning, and hands-on hybrid teaching-can help APsA navigate these questions with steadiness and care.
If I were elected President-Elect, I would wish to approach this complex subject by listening closely to the diversity of views within APsA; staying in steady communication with the IPA; remaining attentive to insights emerging from Action Research; and keeping our long-term vision, our core psychoanalytic values, and the real needs of our membership at the center. Together, I believe we can craft a thoughtful direction that supports analysts-in-training, therapist trainees, our institutes and centers, and our shared aspirations for the future.











